EDITORIAL BOARD Editor in
Chief  Timothy Kudo
Managing Editor
 Michael Falcone
Viewpoint Editor
 Cuauhtemoc Ortega
Staff Representatives
 Maegan Carberry
 Edward Chiao
 Kelly Rayburn
Editorial Board Assistants
 Maegan Carberry
 Edward Chiao
  Unsigned editorials represent a majority opinion of
the Daily Bruin Editorial Board. All other columns, letters and
artwork represent the opinions of their authors. Â Â All
submitted material must bear the author’s name, address, telephone
number, registration number, or affiliation with UCLA. Names will
not be withheld except in extreme cases. Â Â The Bruin
complies with the Communication Board’s policy prohibiting the
publication of articles that perpetuate derogatory cultural or
ethnic stereotypes. Â Â When multiple authors submit
material, some names may be kept on file rather than published with
the material. The Bruin reserves the right to edit submitted
material and to determine its placement in the paper. All
submissions become the property of The Bruin. The Communications
Board has a media grievance procedure for resolving complaints
against any of its publications. For a copy of the complete
procedure, contact the Publications office at 118 Kerckhoff Hall.
Daily Bruin 118 Kerckhoff Hall 308 Westwood Plaza Los Angeles, CA
90024 (310) 825-9898
Bruin lives on fast-forward may soon have an opportunity to slow
down if university administrators decide to convert our 11-week
quarter system into a 17-week semester system, like the one used at
UC Berkeley and in countless private institutions nationwide. There
are pros and cons to both systems, but ultimately the greatest
concern lies in how this will affect the quality of education.
The university’s joint committee evaluating the
ramifications of the potential switch will have many factors to
consider before submitting their report to faculty and
administrators toward the end of March. A semester system provides
students and professors with more time to delve deeply into
academic subject matter instead of operating at the surface level;
it will open up more free time in student schedules for
participation in campus clubs, socializing and working; and it will
eliminate the need for a third financial transaction in
student-related services, like the Financial Aid Office and
On-Campus Housing, saving time and money. But the quarter system
also has its benefits. Because of its fast turnover rate, students
are exposed to more subjects; survey courses are wrapped up
quickly; and junior college students have more opportunities to
transfer.
In making a decision of this magnitude, the joint committee must
include students in the information-gathering and final
decision-making stages of the process. Students, who live the
benefits and flaws of the quarter-system daily, can offer a
valuable source of perspective in this matter. Likewise, students
should make recommendations to their student government about which
system they prefer before the decision is made for them.